Article Search

March 20—At an international conference of the Schiller Institute held in Bad Schwalbach, Germany, March 21-23, 2003, which assembled nearly 600 people from 45 nations, including 120 young people, Lyndon LaRouche opened his keynote address:

March 20—Will former U.S. President Donald Trump be arrested today? Will Presidents Xi and Putin succeed in achieving a negotiated peace in Ukraine? Will the U.S.-U.K.-NATO geopolitical establishment that proposes destroying Taiwan’s economy if Beijing takes control of the island, be swept from the halls of power?

As humanity has been put on the brink of a civilization-ending nuclear war, largely through the machinations of the British and their fellow travelers in the USA, any sensible person would be asking the question: 

March 13—Following the failure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, the unlimited insurance of deposits held at those institutions, in apparent violation of U.S. law, signals a policy orientation towards a bailout of the entire banking system.

Following the failure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, bailout or no bailout isn't the issue. What system will replace the bankrupt one?

March 6—Will the collective West (already a fragmenting assembly) regain its sanity and drop the policies that lead the world to global war and nuclear annihilation?

Feb. 28—The LaRouche movement is circulating the following pre-release of the lead editorial of the upcoming EIR* magazine, as part of an intense, concentrated effort aimed at members of the U.S. Congress, to break through the deafening wall of silence on the barbaric activities sanctioned by U.S. military forces in Syria, military forces which are in that nation illegally—illegally under U.S. law, and illegally under international law. The similarly illegal and barbaric sanctions against Syria must now be lifted.*

Feb. 26—The past week has been a week of changes, both in NATO-land and in the world’s new Eurasian center of power. Anti-war rallies in the United States and Europe bookended the week. LaRouche movement interventions into the U.S. Congress, the issue of Syrian sanctions, and the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline gave added force and direction to the campaign for a new paradigm in the world. China denounced, with new pungency, what that nation sees as U.S. hegemony, while putting forward its own vision for a comprehensive new paradigm—the Global Security Initiative—with specific application to the anti-Russia conflict unfolding on the present (and past?) territory of Ukraine.

Feb. 22—A common thread underlies a span of events this week—from the “Rage Against the War Machine” rally in Washington, D.C. on Feb. 19, to the Feb. 21 Schiller Institute event on the urgent need to lift the sanctions on Syria, to the UN Security Council discussion of the Nord Stream explosions, to CGTN discussing with a Schiller Institute coordinator about the Nord Stream bombings, to Wednesday’s challenge to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries by José Vega, to Thursday’s Schiller Institute event on investigating the Nord Stream revelations in order to stop World War, to the upcoming anti-war, anti-NATO events this coming weekend Feb. 25-26 across Europe.

DIANE SARE: Good afternoon. I want to especially thank Nick [Brana] and Angela [McArdle] for pulling all of us together, and I am pleased that we have smoked out hundreds of FBI agents and thousands of NAFO trolls, just by sticking together to oppose our nation from plunging us into the abyss of thermonuclear war. [cheers]

Feb. 16—This is not a time in history to stand on the sidelines, waiting for an opportune or comfortable moment to enter the fray. The supply of weapons to Ukraine becomes increasingly unpopular among the people of many NATO nations. Seymour Hersh’s exposé of U.S. guilt in the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines looms as the elephant in the room. The major pro-peace events to be held in the capitals of many NATO nations over the next two weeks demand a response. Will you join the efforts, now, while there is still a chance, to prevent the escalation of conflict to a level from which a return may not be possible?

Feb. 10—Helga Zepp-LaRouche took to Twitter on Friday, Feb. 10, to organize thousands of people around a durable peace built upon a new security and development framework in which the fundamental interests of all nations are respected. Kim Dotcom, who hosted the Twitter Space, at first applauded Zepp-LaRouche for her “beautiful” vision and her intention to bring it about, while remaining pessimistic about the potential to bring it into being. But as the discussion unfolded and additional voices entered the conversation, Zepp-LaRouche’s committed optimism carried the day.

Jan. 31—President Lula da Silva of Brazil announced his view that a group of nations needs to come forward to work together for a peace deal in Ukraine. Speaking on Monday, Lula said that he had discussed with Scholz and Macron and intends to discuss with others, the vision of forming a new group of nations—like the formation of the G20 to address the 2008 economic crisis—to work out peace between Russia and Ukraine. The world needs “a club of people who want to achieve peace on the planet,” the president said. “My suggestion is that we create a group of countries, who sit down at the table with Ukraine and Russia to try to find peace…. What we have to do is form a group strong enough to be respected at a negotiating table—and sit down with both sides.”

Jan. 29—The demand by Air Force Gen. Michael Minihan for his subordinates to send in their preparations for war on China, based on his prognostication that by 2025 the United States will be in a military conflict with that nation, was bad enough. That the Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Michael McCaul (R-TX) responded, “I hope he’s wrong as well. I think he’s right, though, unfortunately,” is worse still.

Jan. 24—Under enormous pressure from the US and other NATO members, Germany has made a decision that dramatically heightens the danger of the rapid, irreversible expansion of the conflict currently geographically centered on Ukraine. Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced that Germany has relented to demands, and will send its Leopard 2 battle tanks to Ukraine, and allow other nations to export Leopard 2 tanks in their possession as well. By providing these to a regime that seeks the conquest of Crimea, Germany is once again loosing its tanks upon Russia. Could Russia possibly fail to respond?

What they don't want you to know: Recent breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility in California and the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak in China, along with new fusion geometries explored by private ventures, point the way towards the incredible power of nuclear fusion for transforming our economy and society.

Jan. 22—Has the U.S.-U.K.-NATO system failed? Would its controllers know?

In light of the arrest of Solomon Peña, identified by the “LaRouche PAC” as a “LaRouche PAC Candidate," The LaRouche Organization reiterates that it has no affiliation or association with the so-called “LaRouche PAC.”

Jan. 16—Asked to respond to two questions, the first being the “Joint Statement of the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee (‘2+2’)” of the U.S. and Japanese defense and foreign ministers, about “China’s ongoing and accelerating expansion of its nuclear arsenal,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesman Wang Wenbin was direct: “China is firmly committed to a defensive nuclear strategy. We have honored our pledge to ‘no first use’ of nuclear weapons at any time and under any circumstances and unconditionally not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states or nuclear-weapon-free zones. China is the only one among the five nuclear weapon states to have made these pledges…. For any country, as long as they do not use nuclear weapons against China, they have nothing to worry about being threatened by China’s nuclear weapons. This is the most meaningful transparency a country can provide.”

Jan. 5—“In the face of unprecedented pressure and provocations from the West, we defend our principled positions and protect not only our own interests, but also the interests of all those who stand for a truly democratic world order and the right of countries freely to determine their destiny,” said Russian President Putin during his December 30 video summit with Chinese President Xi.

Jan. 1—What a start to 2023! Today Brazil has a new President, Lula da Silva, who made clear at his inauguration that Brazil is to link up with Argentina in a fight for economic development and the rolling back of poverty in South America. And he has made clear the last several days, that, after the previous President Jair Bolsanaro turned his back, now Brazil will be part of a renewed drive for coordination with Russia, India, China and South Africa—Brazil’s BRICS collaborators—on that economic development.

It's easy to be anti-war in times of peace. But only a deep connection to history and the future can stop war now.

Dec. 27—The recent fusion breakthrough at the U.S.’s National Ignition Facility points to the powerful secrets that nature is just begging to reveal to committed searchers for truth! The breakthrough is all the more impressive in light of the pitifully low levels of fusion funding overall, and the fact that the NIF’s primary mission is to aid in the development of civilization-ending nuclear weapons. But the lessons of combined inertial-magnetic geometries — ideas championed nearly half a century ago by the LaRouche-founded Fusion Energy Foundation — illuminate more clearly a path towards the scientific technological breakthroughs which more than any other will define the next chapter of human history: the commercial controlled use of nuclear fusion power.

Dec. 24—More than 1,000 faith leaders in the United States, representing every major faith tradition and hailing from every state of the nation, have added their names to a call for a Christmas Truce in Ukraine. “In the spirit of the truce that occurred in 1914 during the First World War, we urge our government to take a leadership role in bringing the war in Ukraine to an end through supporting calls for a ceasefire and negotiated settlement, before the conflict results in a nuclear war that could devastate the world’s ecosystems and annihilate all of God’s creation.”

Dec. 13—In light of the clear escalation in the strategic situation, an eerie silence hangs in the air. Demands for immediate negotiations to resolve the conflict in Ukraine should be heard ringing from every rooftop, but instead such calls are few in number and at present inadequate to the requirements of the moment.