Skip to main content
The LaRouche Organization

Main navigation

Main navigation
  • About
    About
    • Why “LaRouchePAC” No Longer Represents the Policies of Lyndon LaRouche
    • 2022 LaRouche Economics Classes
    • Intro to LaRouche: Class Series
  • Campaigns
    Campaigns
    • The Coming US Economic Miracle
    • Crush the Green New Deal
    • Exonerate LaRouche
    • Four Laws
    • History
    • Stop Global Britain's Green War Drive!
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Daily Harley Updates
    • Weekly Helga Webcasts
    • Thursday Fireside Chat at 9pm EST
    • Saturday Manhattan Project at 2pm EST
    • Midwest Discussion
  • Actions
    Actions
    • Tell Your Congressman: Stop NATO Driving Us to Nuclear War!
    • Leaflets
  • Donate
  • Sign-up
  • Articles

Social Media

Social Media
  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • Twitter

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Article
  3. 2023
  4. 01
  5. 17
17 Jan 2023

The LaRouche Organization Has No Affiliation with the "LaRouche PAC"

By Jason Ross and Helga Zepp-LaRouche
Share icon
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share via Messenger
  • Share via WhatsApp
  • Copy site URL
Leading Developments

In light of the arrest of Solomon Peña, identified by the “LaRouche PAC” as a “LaRouche PAC Candidate," The LaRouche Organization reiterates that it has no affiliation or association with the so-called “LaRouche PAC.”

In early 2021, The LaRouche Organization posted a statement written by Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche explaining why we disclaimed any affiliation with the group, which, despite its name, no longer represents the policies of Lyndon LaRouche. The LaRouche Organization wrote at that time:

Helga Zepp-LaRouche … widow of the renowned American economist and statesman Lyndon LaRouche … has issued a letter to the Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee (LPAC) and its Treasurer, Barbara Boyd, demanding that they “immediately cease and desist, both now and in the future” from “using Mr. LaRouche’s name, likeness, and potentially other confusingly similar terms.”

Zepp-LaRouche explained why in a statement — Why “LaRouchePAC” No Longer Represents the Policies of Lyndon LaRouche — including the following:

My requests for the PAC to adhere to the policies of the LaRouche movement and to not associate the LaRouche name with policies that were inconsistent with our views, which started to occur within the PAC immediately after the death of Mr. LaRouche, were rebuked to such an extent that Mrs. Boyd and a group of individuals sharing her views issued a document in November 2020 proclaiming their “irrevocable” independence from the leadership of the LaRouche movement, myself included, founded by my husband over 50 years ago.

While paying lip service to some of Lyndon LaRouche’s ideas, and using video footage of him, in reality the political positions of the PAC increasingly diverged from the policies of the LaRouche movement and my late husband…

In addition to Zepp-LaRouche’s statement, the “LaRouche PAC” itself has publicly stated its non-affiliation / non-association with Helga Zepp-LaRouche in this December 2022 posting (archived):

LaRouche PAC is not affiliated with or associated in any way with Helga Zepp-LaRouche and has not been for a long time.
Lyndon and Helga LaRouche

Related Content

fusion icon

Age of Reason or the Annihilation of Humanity?

Fusion could be a lot closer than you think

Mozart

Not ‘90 Seconds to Midnight,’ but One Week to ‘The Age of Reason or the Annihilation of Humanity?’

Jan. 27—“Pentiti!” “No!”…“Ah! tempo più non v’è!” “Repent!” “No!”…“Ah! Your time is up!” But the Doomsday Clock still read 90 seconds to midnight! What had happened? The explanation was simple. The clock-time was not physical time. They had all precisely miscalculated. Anglosphere geopoliticians and “strategic realists,” take heed. “Pentiti!”

LaRouche8

Confront an Evil March Toward WWIII With Relentless Optimism

Jan. 26—Yesterday’s “Tanks to Ukraine” parade, a silly and dangerous piece of theater, meant primarily to busy Europe into a perpetual state of conflict, provoked more than a few forces around the world today to dig deeper into their own principles. In Gottfried Leibniz’s “best of all possible worlds,” evil is certainly possible, but the better angel of mankind’s nature always has the capacity to rise to the occasion, forging a greater good than otherwise would have been possible. Today provided more than a few examples.

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Article
  3. 2023
  4. 01
  5. 17

Footer

  • Privacy

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • Twitter