Article Search

With the inauguration of Joe Biden, the power of the U.S. Presidency has been put at the service of those demanding a centralization of power in the hands of private central bankers, to push through a genocidal "Green New Deal."

Jan. 22, 2021 — Surrounded by tens of thousands of troops and a sparse crowd, the inauguration of Joe Biden as President of the United States had little in common with the usual celebratory mood which surrounds the peaceful transfer of power in the American republic. It bore instead a distinct resemblance to the installation of a regime which seized power in a coup in a banana republic — which, in fact, is what happened! With a majority of Republicans convinced that the election was stolen from Donald Trump, and angry that neither courts nor legislatures seriously investigated the charges of fraud, many view Biden as an “illegitimate” president. The Inauguration occurred two weeks after a deadly riot overwhelmed security forces at the U.S. Capitol, on January 6, which disrupted efforts by Trump supporters in the Congress who were engaged in a fully legal, Constitutional process of challenging the certification of Electors for Biden, due to evidence of voting irregularities. It occurred one week after the House of Representatives impeached President Trump for a second time, accusing him of inciting the “insurrection” which led to the storming of the Capitol, in a rush to judgement in a highly charged environment. Perhaps given the turmoil and uncertainty caused by these events, it is not surprising that President Biden emphasized a call for “unity … unity for a divided nation” in his inaugural address. Yet this call had a decidedly hollow ring to it, as Biden and his supporters, instead of promoting policies which can foster unity, are moving to criminalize any opposition to what he was installed to do as President, going so far as to label Trump supporters as “racists” and even “terrorists.” This is hardly a language which would facilitate unity and reconciliation!Obviously uninterested in acting in a manner which would promote unity, the cabal behind the four-year effort to overturn the election of Trump in 2016, and which rigged the 2020 election for Biden, is acting to increase the polarization in the nation. In their minds, they have finally succeeded in removing Trump — and now they are going for scorched earth destruction of Trump and his supporters. Trump himself, in addition to facing an impeachment trial in the Senate, has been threatened with the prospect of numerous civil and criminal charges against him, his family and his businesses in the courts. Leading Democrats and intelligence/security officials are gearing up for an assault against him and the seventy-five million Americans who voted for him. Hillary Clinton, for example, still bitter over her 2016 loss to Trump, called for a “9/11-style Commission” to investigate the riot on January 6, focused not on the pre-planning that went into it — which would show that, rather than an incitement by Trump, security officials were aware well in advance that plans had been made for an attack, and did nothing to prepare for it — but revisiting the lies of Russiagate, decrying Trump as one who “disdains democracy” and remains under the control of Putin! She was joined on her podcast by House Speaker Pelosi, who agreed to establish such a commission, and reminded listeners proudly that she had once confronted Trump by telling him, “With you, Mr. President, all roads lead to Putin.” Both described the riot as “a gift to Putin.” Simultaneously, such vitriol was reinforced by unhinged drone murderer and former CIA chief John Brennan, in his description of the Trump movement as an “unholy alliance … of religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians.” Brennan played a leading role against Trump in fabricating the debunked narrative of Russiagate, and has yet to be prosecuted for the damage to the nation resulting from his lies. Also chiming in is the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Democratic think tank, which claims that the coalition built by Trump “could become a full-fledged insurgency that poses a significant and enduring threat to all Americans.” CAP’s statement calls for deploying the “full use of existing tools and authorities” to combat it. One of those tools which is supported by the Democrats is social media censorship, which has even been imposed against the accounts that President Trump had successfully employed, to combat the mainstream media lies and slanders against him. CNN went so far as to feature a “cult expert” who asserted that Trump supporters are part of a “cult", and they must be “deprogrammed." A Strategy For True Unity Those who long for “unity” should revisit the efforts of Abraham Lincoln, who famously intervened against the toxic polarization which had been stoked for years against the American republic by British imperial interests, in his speech of June 16, 1858, accepting his party’s nomination for U.S. Senator. Known for its most prominent line, “A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand,” Lincoln understood that the division of the Union into half-slave, half-free “cannot endure permanently.” This address was a prescient warning, delivered less than two years before his election as President, and nearly three years prior to the beginning of the bloody civil war, which began shortly after he was inaugurated. The deeper issue addressed by Lincoln in this speech and in his presidency, was the battle between two completely irreconcilable systems: the American System, as forged by the Founding Fathers after their successful War of Independence against the British Empire, and the British System of “free trade.” Slavery was imposed by the British system, which intended to preserve a quasi-colonial status for America, as an agrarian society of planter aristocrats, using slave labor to produce cheap cotton for British textile mills. The southern aristocrats, backed by London, were allied with New York bankers and Boston’s merchant trading class, both of which retained close ties to their former colonial masters. The Constitution of the Confederate States of America endorsed slavery and state rights, favoring a weak central government with little power. The Confederacy was seen by influential British Foreign Minister Lord Palmerston as the best way to weaken the United States, presaging a reincorporation of at least part of the country into the Empire. Lincoln’s revival of the American System was crucial not only for a victory in the Civil War, but in the development of post-war America as the strongest industrial economy in the world. His commitment to building the Transcontinental railroad became a driver for not only westward expansion, but in unifying the nation. This was furthered by the adoption of Hamiltonian credit policies and the use of tariffs to protect America’s fledgling industries. This application of the American system allowed for the advance of modern industry, especially in developing the steel and engineering capabilities required for the production of machine tools, which boosted the productivity of labor both in manufacturing and agricultural production, which over time led to the development of higher living standards for working people. By decisively defeating the attempts by the British and their U.S. allies to divide the U.S., Lincoln intended to unite the people around a national mission to develop the continent, with far-reaching effects internationally. This succeeded, despite his assassination by a network directed from London, through restoring the American System model created by Alexander Hamilton and his allies among the Foundin Fathers. This model, revived by Lincoln and advisers such as Henry Carey and E. Peshine Smith, was adopted by many other nations after 1876, including Bismarck’s Germany, France, Russia and Japan. This advance in America, when copied in such plans as Count Witte’s Trans-Siberian railroad for Russia and Eurasia, and the proposed Berlin to Baghdad line, was seen as an existential threat by the British Empire, which depended on its military control of the seas, and imposition of free trade to dominate the world economy. Equally galling to the London-based financial empire was Lincoln’s alliance with Tsar Alexander II of Russia, who deployed ships of the Russian navy to prevent a blockade of northern ports by the British fleet, a repeat of Russia’s support for the American colonies, through its role in the League of Armed Neutrality, during the War of Independence against the British. The roots of Russiagate, the desperate effort to prevent Trump from collaboration with Putin and Russia, can be seen in the Empire’s fear historically of such an alliance. What the Empire intends for a Biden administration is to return to the endless war policies of the Bush and Obama-Biden administrations, and imposing a global central banker’s dictatorship, called the “Great Reset,” in support of a genocidal Green New Deal. To succeed in doing this requires crushing the Trump movement in the U.S., using the kind of gang-countergang tactics historically applied by the Empire to crush their opponents, which means increasing the polarization. National Mission For Global Development The attempt by President Trump to define a global strategy for a sovereign U.S., free from the endless regional wars fought on behalf of global neoliberal and geopolitical interests, is what made him a target of the City of London, and its allies in the U.S. “Military Industrial Complex.” It is the policies of the interlocking directorates of global cartels, which in addition to inciting “endless” wars, impose the forced underdevelopment of the former colonial world, with the neoliberal austerity and free trade policies which have reduced living standards in the trans-Atlantic region, to maintain their power, which is needed to protect their collapsing, bankrupt system through genocidal looting. This is what has driven the polarization which today increases geopolitical tensions. Add to that the deliberate fostering of “identity politics” inside nations, which mirrors the geopolitical divide-and-conquer strategy applied in international policies, which pits smaller groups against each other in a fight for a shrinking pie, and you have a formula for a Hobbesian world of each against all. A compelling argument to counter this polarization was presented by Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her weekly dialogue on January 21. Asked to comment of Biden’s hypocritical call for “unity", she offered some good advice for him: Noting that he is a Catholic, she said, “...he should read the Encyclical of Pope Paul VI that he wrote in 1967, which was called Populorum Progressio, or On the Development of Peoples, and in which he said that the ‘the new name for peace is development.’ And in the same way, one can say that the ‘new name for unity is development.’ The only way one can hope to have unity inside the United States would be to put on the agenda an economic program which would give productive jobs to every American, which would undo the economic injustices which are, after all, the reason why Trump was elected in 2016, and why all the Trump voters are still sticking to Trump. So, if he wants to have unity, he should make development the new name for unity, and internationally it would go in the same direction.” While it appears unlikely that, as presently constituted, the Biden administration would heed the founder of the Schiller Institute’s sage advice, she noted that the strategic, social, economic and political crises confronting it require a change in direction. To succeed in avoiding a global systemic economic/financial collapse, and more wars, she advocated adopting Lyndon LaRouche’s Four Power agreement to establish a New Bretton Woods, and implementing his Four Economic Laws, which are derived from applying the American System of the Founding Fathers and Lincoln. A sovereign U.S. would find common cause with the sovereign nations of Russia, China and India, which in alliance would be able to forge an economic and military power to defeat the British Empire and its fifth column in the U.S. and the European Union. Further, she believes that a significant segment of the Trump movement would support a shift in this direction, as Trump’s campaign in 2016 incorporated elements of LaRouche’s approach, including a return to Glass Steagall banking separation, infrastructure investment and fostering scientific and technological advance at the frontiers of science — echoing his Four Laws — and cooperation with Russia and China. While the combined effects of Russiagate, the COVID pandemic, and opposition from anti-Trump layers in the Republican Party, who joined with their fellow War Hawks and neoliberals in the Democratic Party against him, sabotaged the potential of the Trump administration, the Trump base remained loyal to the President, and could be mobilized again to back the principles of the American System. If committing the citizens of the U.S. to a unified national mission is truly the goal, then Zepp-LaRouche’s strategy, based on returning to the principles of the American System, must be deployed to defeat the British Empire and its lackeys in America.

What happened to QAnon? What do you think of Joe Biden's call for "unity" (what a hypocrite!)? What is our post-election strategy? Why did Trump not pardon Julian Assange? How can we develop an emotional connection to Reason?

When Abraham Lincoln stated in June 1858 that "A House divided against itself cannot stand", he was identifying the efforts of supporters of the British System, among southern planters and Boston-New York financial interests, to divide the U.S. More than 160 years later, we are again caught in a battle between those War Hawks and neoliberals, who would divide us around phony, narrow interpretations of "self-interest", versus those committed to a national mission based on the American System.

Those committed to removing Donald Trump from office have applied the tactics of regime change "Color Revolutions" for the last four years, with an agenda of removing any opposition to their plans for a global banker's dictatorship called "The Great Reset."

As all eyes are focused on tomorrow's inauguration in Washington, D.C., the world's financial oligarchs are racing to put the Great Reset in place, i.e., a global banker's dictatorship designed to preserve and deepen the control of an alliance of private Central Banks over national economies.

The 'Reichstag Fire' False Flag event of January 6 provided a pretext for the imperial forces of the so-called Military Industrial Complex to shift to a New Fascism, to suppress opposition to its Schachtian austerity policies and new wars.

The following is an edited version of the presentation given by The LaRouche Organization’s Harley Schlanger to the weekly Saturday Manhattan Project Town Hall of The LaRouche Organization: I’m going to give a summary view of the intent of the military-industrial complex behind the January 6th Reichstag Fire event at the U.S. Capitol, and the rush to judgement impeachment. What unfolded is classic British counterinsurgency strategy.Let’s begin with January 6th. This was a pretext for the next phase of a fascist coup…. Let me take you back to some statements Lyndon LaRouche made in 1971 following Richard Nixon’s ill-fated decision to end the Bretton Woods system and move the United States into an economy of floating exchange rates, speculation, and what was in reality a post-industrial economy. This is something that LaRouche was warning about, had forecast would happen. When it happened, he was very clear on what needed to be done. Most importantly, what he identified as the contributing factors, were the decision of the global financial oligarchy to move into an era of environmentalism, post-industrial economy, and neo-Malthusianism. That is, global depopulation. And he identified that if this were not reversed, we would be heading to fascism. Not fascism as the image most people have of jack-booted soldiers marching with a swastika, but fascism as an economic system typified by the role of Hitler’s Minister of Finance, Hjalmar Schacht, who was the choice of the London-New York banking crowd to oversee the phase shift in Germany from an industrial republic to a destructive force targetting all of Europe and the United States. It was that policy which was the policy of the corporate cartels. What we’ve seen in the United States since LaRouche made that warning in 1971, is a series of phase shifts economically and politically. I’m just going to identify a couple of those which are the more important ones. One of them was the mid- to late-1980s, when the Democratic Party adopted what they called the Third Way. Dump the policies of Franklin Roosevelt and John F Kennedy, that were committed to the idea of uplifting the conditions for the whole of the population, and instead became “neo-liberals”—essentially dependent on money from Wall Street, and carrying out policies for the benefit of the wealthiest, including the bankers and financiers. That was the shift that brought us the Clinton administration; Al Gore was key in setting that up. The second phase shift was after 9/11. This was another forecast LaRouche made, that there would be a move toward a fascist policy following a Reichstag Fire event, which we saw with 9/11. The Patriot Act, which was introduced then, was based on something that Joe Biden authored in 1995, called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act, which called for an expansion of the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act], but most importantly it identified terrorism as based on political beliefs. So, when the Patriot Act was passed and pushed by John Ashcroft, he contacted Biden to try to get Democratic support for it, and Biden agreed. We know what it means to have not just the mass surveillance, but the use of social media to manipulate the way people think and act. We also had the permanent wars launched as a result of the Reichstag Fire on September 11, 2001; permanent wars that we were in and still are in. But it became the basis of Donald Trump’s victory in 2016, by appealing to the American people based on their being tired of war, tired of austerity, saying that we are going to end these wars and rebuild our nation. That was responded to by the military-industrial complex, the Deep State, the swamp, or what we call the British Empire, by launching Russiagate to get rid of Donald Trump. We identified this from the beginning as a regime-change coup that intended not just to defeat Trump, but to change the country, to demoralize his supporters, and to prevent the United States from asserting its national sovereignty and building its economic power based on the principles of the American System. Let’s jump ahead to what happened January 6th. There was a perfectly legitimate contest in the Congress, which has been launched by the Democrats before. This was not unprecedented, challenging the certification of the electors. The Democrats did it in 2004, in the Bush-Kerry election, and in 2016. But to read the mass media, or watch the television coverage, it was as though this was some kind of absolute break with the traditions of American history. But it was a Constitutionally-defined action that was being taken. But what did happen was the event at the Capitol building. Now, there are many unanswered questions, and I just want to pose a couple of them without going into great detail. These were brought up by the investigative journalist John Solomon. He pointed out that the New York Police Department, the Capitol Police, and the FBI all had advance warnings that there could be violent protests at the Capitol when these hearings took place on January 6th. Keep in mind, on the FBI, this in itself can be somewhat suspicious, given that we know that the FBI repeatedly deploys people into organizations to be provocateurs. They did this with the civil rights movement; they did it with the people fighting the civil rights movement. They’ve done it with the left and right historically. It does clearly appear as though there were provocateurs in these riots. Just keep in mind that the FBI supposedly had advance notice. But here are the questions you have to look at. Why was there not more robust security if there had been these advance warnings? The Capitol Police chief, Stephen Sund, reported that he went to the House and Senate security leaders, personally, and suggested they bring in more police, possibly the National Guard. He was rebuffed. So, there was not an adequate police presence at the Capitol when this started. But secondly, if you look at the timeline, the first assault on the Capitol began while President Trump was still speaking. He was speaking for an additional 20 minutes when people started swarming into the Capitol building. The question Solomon asked is, "How can you be accused of inciting something that was preplanned, and started before he supposedly said the words that incited the crowd. This was not an incitement; it was a provocation. And that’s why we see this as a Reichstag Fire. What was the result of what happened on January 6th? Well, the attempt to get rid of Trump moved ahead. The idea of impeaching someone in the last days of office is somewhat of a strange conception. But we know that Pelosi has been intending this for a long time. What was more than an attack on Trump, was an attempt to criminalize a movement. He got 75 million votes, and by presenting him as a madman, as a rioter and insurrectionist, by implication they’re saying that anyone who voted for him was crazy, was an insurrectionist, was a potential danger. They criminalized the opposition to the policies, by making it appear that if you didn’t go along with the Pelosi-Schumer agenda, you’re a potential criminal or potential terrorist. They’re out to change the Constitution, especially in the way elections are run. And the censorship policy which was brought in, was designed to cut people off from an ability to communicate; to even discuss ideas. If you challenge the counting of the vote, you might be a terrorist, and suspect, and possibly get your access to internet platforms cut. Finally, the effect of this will be to increase the radicalization of some Trump supporters, and set the phase for more violence in the future. It will be done to justify more surveillance, more preemptive measures, and so on. Now look, what was the Trump movement? It was people who were angry at watching the country go to hell; watching the cities collapse, the health care system be torn apart. Our young men and women being sent to wars that are unwinnable; fighting for goals that are never specified, by politicians who never served in the military, and really don’t care about the problems they’re creating for the nation. So, you create an environment of polarization and radicalization. The other aspect of classic British gang-countergang strategy is, you do it with the left and the right. You have left and right radicals, who are fed by this process. We’ve seen it with the Black Lives Matter and Antifa. We see it on the right with the Q movement and militias. Many of the people who get caught up in these things are people who legitimately are concerned about what they see as a collapse of the system, collapse of society, but who feel helpless to act through standard political means, because the political system itself is so corrupted by big money on both sides; the left and the right. So, what happens? Let’s look at this QAnon just for a moment. I know this is going to aggravate some people, probably enrage others. But you better face it now. If you were angry and frustrated and looking for some answers, many people turn to QAnon, because it seemed to have an explanation of what was going on in the attacks on Donald Trump. But what was it really? It’s a classic British operation of psychological warfare. It engaged people in a kind of political video game. A world of warcraft for politics, where people were encouraged to watch what was going on; were given drops of information—little bits and pieces. Which, by the way, were available in other places besides the QAnon postings. But think about what was said. There are 30 sealed indictments, 100 sealed indictments, 300 sealed indictments. Now I’m told they’re saying there are over 220,000 sealed indictments. That’s a lot of sealed indictments. How come people haven’t been going to prison? We were told there would be mass arrests; we were told that Biden and Hillary Clinton are wearing ankle bracelets. That Gina Haspel, the CIA Director, was killed in a nonexistent shoot-out in Frankfurt, Germany. If she wasn’t killed, she was sent down to Gitmo. Some of them say the Pope has been killed or replaced by a hologram. And what we’re also told is, don’t worry about the chaos, the good guys are coming to the rescue. Trust the plan. The hook was the attack on the corruption of a broken-down system, but there was not a strategic perspective. People were not organized around a counter strategy, other than wait for the good guys and cheer them on, and in the meantime, become informed. A lot of people did become awakened by the victory of Donald Trump and the events that took place afterwards. Much was exposed about the corruption in the intelligence community. The Clinton, Obama and Bush networks in both parties. The corruption coming from the United Kingdom. But there were diversions; attempts to point people in different directions. And instead of going after the people pulling the strings, you went after some of the puppets, who were the ones the string-pullers were putting in your face. What is the ultimate plan of the people who ran this? To push through the Great Reset. To establish a global bankers’ dictatorship that will essentially give the power to the people behind the central banks, but also in the corporate cartels. Give them the power over not only the circulation and the production of credit, but where it’s spent; where the money is spent. Eliminate the role of parliaments and governments and the Congress to make policy. Why? Because they’re too pliable to trying to answer some of the demands of their constituents. Put it instead in the hands of technocrats run by the banks, so that we can have the kind of austerity that will not only allow them to pay off their debts, but kill off whole sections of the population. They don’t intend to have a sound economy; that’s not what the World Economic Forum and the Davos billionaires intend. They intend to radically reduce the world’s population. That’s their plan; a bankers’ dictatorship. So, while people were caught in the left-right gangs and countergangs, this is what has been going on in the background. There are still people who are saying, “You’re wrong. You wait and see, there’s going to be an insurrection act, there’s going to be martial law, mass arrests in the next week.” Well, if it happens, we’ll see. I don’t believe it, and I think many of you are going to have a rude awakening when you realize you’ve been played by the same people who ran the impeachment against Donald Trump. The same people who have wrecked our economy and put the United States into the category of a mere banana republic with the manipulations they’ve carried out over the recent weeks and months. We have a strategy at The LaRouche Organization; we have a program. And it starts with two points. Know your enemy and how they think, and how they manipulate you. And secondly, how do we revive the American System of physical economics, which was the great contribution that Lyndon LaRouche made in his many years in politics and statecraft in the United States?

Events since the November 3 election, including the escalation of the ongoing coup in the U.S. and its effects on the world, have been a cause of tension and extreme anxiety. This is exacerbated by censorship, "Fake News", rumors, gossip and the degrading effects of a "social media culture." How do we deal with that? How can we elevate our level of thinking, in the midst of this chaos, to the "new plateau" advocated by Helga Zepp LaRouche?

The second impeachment of President Trump has nothing to do with the accusation that he engaged in "incitement of insurrection" — how do you incite something that was pre-planned, and known to be operational? It was the latest in a string of frauds, e.g. Russiagate, Impeachment 1.0, etc. — designed to bring the U.S. back into full participation in wars and geopolitical provocations, and financial swindles, run by global corporate cartels, which now include those Big Tech firms run by Davos billionaires and hedge funds. Their system is collapsing, so they are racing to set up the "Great Reset."

Forget all the pious moaning about how the events of January 6 were an "insurrection against our democracy." It was in reality a pretext, to be used to bring about a phase change, just as 9/11 was used to put the U.S. into permanent wars and a surveillance state. Today, the impeachment against President Trump is intended to show his 74 million voters that no opposition will be tolerated to what the Trans-Atlantic establishment intends: more wars and censorship, as they move to impose the Great Reset, which is a global banker's dictatorship designed to dramatically reduce the world's population.

With an effort underway in the U.S. House to vote to impeach President Trump for the second time -- an impeachment with virtually no chance to pass the Senate — the imperial oligarchy represented by Pelosi and Schumer is moving to expand the powers of both private companies and government to suppress freedom of speech and assembly.

The media narrative on January 6 is a classic example of a "fallacy of composition." The truth is that the events of that day provided the latest pretext for the Russiagate coup plotters to remove the President of the U.S., while continuing their post-9/11 attack on the U.S. Constitution.

What really happened on January 6-7? What should be done now? How can we rebuild optimism for those who have succumbed to the belief that the U.S. is broken beyond repair?

Was the mini-riot on the Capitol grounds yesterday orchestrated, to disrupt the Constitutionally mandated hearings going on in the Congress? Where were the security forces, the police, and the National Guard? Why was President Trump's Twitter account silenced, when he called for demonstrators to disperse peacefully?

The effort by supporters of President Trump to decertify slates of electors for Joe Biden in a number of battleground states will take place in both the House and Senate today, as large crowds of Trump supporters are mobilizing outside.

As the Congress takes up its Constitutional task of certifying that the slates of Electors chosen by the states were chosen fairly and under the law, the Washington Post has called for ripping out of the Constitution the articles which define the mandates given to Congress and to state legislatures to protect the sanctity of elections.

Update: British judge denies U.S. extradition request for Julian Assange! Beginning with the verdict to be announced today on whether Julian Assange will be extradited to the U.S. to stand trial on charges of violating the Espionage Act, events this week will go a long way toward determining which way the U.S. is headed in the New Year.

Do you still admire the pomp and pageantry of the British monarchy, and view it as a thrilling but quaint relic of an ancient era? If so, you are the victim of psychological warfare run by the Queen's intelligence agencies, which defend murderous imperial policies run by the International Monetary Fund on behalf of the globalist financial cartel, while hiding their commitment to a radical reduction of population under the cover of the Fake Science of "man made climate change."

As a result of years of media lies and disinformation, and outright brainwashing in the education system, few are aware that the major battle today is between the American System of Physical Economy, as advanced by Lyndon LaRouche, and the British Imperial System of Genocide.

President Trump was right when he threatened to veto the budget deal and the COVID relief measures. It is bad enough that it included a paltry $600 payment per adult as an emergency measure, when as many as 30 million Americans face losing their homes and apartments.

As we head into a new year likely to be filled at its outset by uncertainty and chaos, one thing is certain: the globalist War Hawks and neo-liberals are escalating not only to ensure that President Trump is removed from office, but that his intent to break from the Bush-Obama world order is ended, putting us back into the endless wars and murderous austerity he was trying to stop.

The blatant lies and corrupt actions in defense of the collapsing imperial global order are increasingly visible to growing numbers of people. Today we have an update on three stories which require a response from the American people and our allies internationally to avoid the dangerous course set in motion by the backers of a would-be Biden administration. Will we act in cooperation to defeat the City of London/Wall Street globalists, who are moving to pit the leading sovereign nations, the U.S., Russia and China, against each other, so the imperial corporatists can impose a central banker's dictatorship?

There is a powerful—and necessary—flank, which can be employed to not only get to the bottom of what happened in the 2020 election, but also expose those committed to using a would-be Biden administration to impose a global corporatist dictatorship.

In the midst of an unprecedented challenge to the outcome of last month's Presidential election in the United States, the suit filed by the state of Texas before the Supreme Court of the United States seemed to represent the decisive legal battleground over the 2020 election fraud. The Texas suit charged that the voting process and counting in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania violated federal law, and the rights of voters to have an honest election. Both sides were prepared for an explosive conclusion: a total of 18 states filed amici briefs in support of Texas, and six of those states filed a motion to intervene, indicating additional strong support for Texas’s initiative. Joining those states, 106 Republican Congressmen signed onto a brief to file a separate motion of amicus curiae with Texas. On the other side, 22 other states plus the District of Columbia filed a brief backing the four states, to counter the Texas suit.In the midst of an unprecedented challenge to the outcome of last month's Presidential election in the United States, the suit filed by the state of Texas before the Supreme Court of the United States seemed to represent the decisive legal battleground over the 2020 election fraud. The Texas suit charged that the voting process and counting in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania violated federal law, and the rights of voters to have an honest election. Both sides were prepared for an explosive conclusion: a total of 18 states filed amici briefs in support of Texas, and six of those states filed a motion to intervene, indicating additional strong support for Texas’s initiative. Joining those states, 106 Republican Congressmen signed onto a brief to file a separate motion of amicus curiae with Texas. On the other side, 22 other states plus the District of Columbia filed a brief backing the four states, to counter the Texas suit.