Skip to main content
The LaRouche Organization

Main navigation

Main navigation
  • About
    About
    • 2022 LaRouche Economics Classes
    • Intro to LaRouche: Class Series
  • Campaigns
    Campaigns
    • The LaRouche Oasis Plan for Southwest Asia
    • Stop NATO's World War
    • Stop Global Britain's Green War Drive!
    • The Coming US Economic Miracle
    • Crush the Green New Deal
    • Exonerate LaRouche
    • Four Laws
    • History
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Daily Harley Updates
    • Saturday Manhattan Project at 2pm EDT
    • Weekly Helga Webcasts
    • Thursday Fireside Chat at 9pm EDT
    • Diane Sare Friday Symposium
    • Sunday LaRouche Show 10am EDT
    • Weekly Battle Report, Wednesdays 8pm EDT
  • Actions
    Actions
    • Circulate this Bulletin: Wall Street Gave Us This Crisis; LaRouche Has the Solution
    • Circulate This Bulletin: 'Will The British Decapitate The Presidency Before Independence Day?'
    • Circulate This Bulletin: End The U.S.-British Special Relationship!
    • Leaflets
  • Donate
    Donate
    • Make a Donation
    • Become a Member!
  • Sign-up
  • Articles
  • Interventions

Social Media

Social Media
  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • X
  • Soundcloud
  • Spotify

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Article
  3. 2025
  4. 01
  5. 15
15 Jan 2025

Conclusion: Is there a “Deep State”?

Share icon
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share via Messenger
  • Share via WhatsApp
  • Copy site URL

Unsurprisingly, the notion of a “Deep State” apparatus has been derided as a “conspiracy theory”—by the adherents of the Deep State. In fact, common sense dictates that in an enormous institution like the U.S. government, whose key administrators are frequently replaced in elections, there must be what the British like to call “continuity of government”: a permanent team of bureaucrats who offer their expertise to each newly elected administration, while retaining their own ideological prejudices, their own unchanging agendas, and their long-term allegiances to people and institutions both within and without the government per se (such as the infamous “Military-Industrial Complex). These people are the actual day-to-day managers of government, and it takes an exceptionally tough leader to compel them to change course.

The hue and cry over the nominations of Gabbard and Patel suggests that these individuals —and the Administration that they hope to represent— may have the opportunity, means, and motivation to finally clean out the painfully obvious, longstanding corruption in the government agencies they will run. It is urgent that they be confirmed.

Once that happens, the people of the United States must then demand and secure the immediate formation of a new “Church Committee,” a Congressional committee to investigate the unauthorized, lying and criminal operations of the nation's intelligence agencies, 50 years after Sen. Frank Church valiantly sought to do so. We must expose the Liars Bureau, and prosecute its members to the fullest extent of the law. We must fight to bring to light all the crimes committed against the American Presidency, and American republic, by its enemies, foreign and domestic—especially those operating under the guise of the British-American “special relationship.” This is an essential precondition for the United States to regain its once-honorable and trusted role in the world community, and the confidence of the American people in “equal justice under the law” for all its citizens.

Back to the Table of Contents

Related Content

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Article
  3. 2025
  4. 01
  5. 15

Footer

  • Privacy

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • X
  • Soundcloud
  • Spotify