A new financial and strategic architecture for peace and development is taking shape.  The U.S., and NATO are opposing this.  Why?

Dec. 18—“The U.S. may think it’s winning in Ukraine but it cannot stop the inexorable shift to a new world order.” That was the theme of Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Anatoly Antonov’s interview with Newsweek published Dec. 17, in which Newsweek’s editors felt compelled to sprinkle with spin supporting the anti-Russia narrative.

Dec. 18—The Executive Intelligence Review symposium “Peace On Earth, Or Humanity’s Doom? The Case For Negotiations” should be viewed as an “epistemological springboard” for our international “Dona Nobis Pacem” campaign, already well underway in certain respects. Note the increasing worldwide response, of institutions and individuals alike, to the Vatican’s proposal to host peace talks. We also can propose to organize all citizens of good will, in these next weeks, to act as a world chorus for a principled peace in Ukraine. This takes organizing which will use the inspiration of the artist to supersede the pessimism of the political pragmatist. To arrive at a superior policymaking method among nations in order to avert thermonuclear war in time will demand a poetic change in the thinking of all those involved.